Feedback please - what should the new documentation platform be called?

[Jonathan Hung]

I'm afraid that "docs-base" could be mis-interpreted as "something to build
on top of" which isn't the case.

How about: "docs-template" and "docs-core"?


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Cheetham, Anastasia <acheetham at ocadu.ca>
wrote:

>
>  On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Hung <jhung at ocadu.ca> wrote:
>
>  Looking at the words I'm using to describe these repositories, maybe:
>
>    - "documentation-skeleton" and "documentation-helpers"
>    - "fluid-documentation-core" and "fluid-documentation-helpers" (fluid
>    being the maintainers of the project)
>
>   Here are my impressions; take them for what they’re worth :-)
>
>  I’m not liking the “fluid-“ prefix; the repositories will be part of
> fluid-project, which is probably sufficient. We don’t have the prefix on
> any other repositories…
>
>  I also find “documentation-“ a bit long. Could we go with “docs-“ ?
>
>
>
>  “skeleton" seems ok (especially if this is similar to something that
> docpad calls skeleton); another word that comes to mind is “template”
>
>  “helpers” sounds a bit flouncy to me. It could the perceived to be
> optional. “base” sounds more required, more foundational.
>
>    --
> Anastasia Cheetham – acheetham at ocadu.ca
> Inclusive Design Research Centre
> Inclusive Design Institute
> OCAD University
>
>


-- 

*JONATHAN HUNG*

INCLUSIVE DESIGNER, IDRC



*T:* 416 977 6000 x3951

*F:* 416 977 9844

*E:* jhung at ocadu.ca



*OCAD UNIVERSITY*

Inclusive Design Research Centre

205 Richmond Street W, Toronto, ON, M5V 1V3



www.ocadu.ca

www.idrc.ocad.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20150720/22f732e2/attachment.html>