Feedback please - what should the new documentation platform be called?

Cheetham, Anastasia acheetham at ocadu.ca
Thu Jul 16 15:32:06 EDT 2015


On Jul 16, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Jonathan Hung <jhung at ocadu.ca<mailto:jhung at ocadu.ca>> wrote:

Looking at the words I'm using to describe these repositories, maybe:

  *   "documentation-skeleton" and "documentation-helpers"
  *   "fluid-documentation-core" and "fluid-documentation-helpers" (fluid being the maintainers of the project)

Here are my impressions; take them for what they’re worth :-)

I’m not liking the “fluid-“ prefix; the repositories will be part of fluid-project, which is probably sufficient. We don’t have the prefix on any other repositories…

I also find “documentation-“ a bit long. Could we go with “docs-“ ?



“skeleton" seems ok (especially if this is similar to something that docpad calls skeleton); another word that comes to mind is “template”

“helpers” sounds a bit flouncy to me. It could the perceived to be optional. “base” sounds more required, more foundational.

--
Anastasia Cheetham – acheetham at ocadu.ca<mailto:acheetham at ocadu.ca>
Inclusive Design Research Centre
Inclusive Design Institute
OCAD University

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20150716/c8a3127e/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list