QA test plans for Engage 0.3 beta

Tue Feb 16 17:20:04 UTC 2010

Hi James and Justin,

Your suggestions make complete sense. I am adding the changes for Voiceover
testing within the tests. I am adding a section on 'Using the iPhone with
VoiceOver' in the Getting Started page.

Thanks.

Sam

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Justin Obara <justin.obara at utoronto.ca>wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> I think it makes sense to reuse where possible.
>
> Since we want to make sure that users making use of VoiceOver are able to
> have the same experience as those not, I think it best to have them sit side
> by side, so that we make sure that they are always in sync. Also this would
> reduce the repetition throughout the wiki.
>
> I think you should probably have a section for instructions on how to
> launch the application. That would include instructions on how to have save
> it as a home screen app or to launch in safari, and the appropriate url.
> (you may have this already).
>
> Then the rest of the code should be fairly similar, with some deviations
> for expected results for the VoiceOver and possibly some procedural
> difference as well. For example we want to attempt to follow the same flow
> that a voiceover user would. so for example you would want someone to just
> activate VoiceOver and then double click everything... they should be using
> the VoiceOver navigation semantics. Actually this could probably be included
> in an instructions section for running this plan with VoiceOver.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> I'm sort of in a flurry with this engage release so if I've been totally
> incoherent please let me know.
>
>
> Thanks
> Justin
>
>
> On 2010-02-12, at 3:26 PM, James William Yoon wrote:
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I took a read through the the QA test plans for VoiceOver you wrote. It
> seems to me that, with one or two exceptions, all the tests are
> identical--even with the one or two exceptions, the difference is often just
> an extra line in the procedure indicating that the test should be run
> directly in Safari.
>
> I wonder if it would make better sense simply to layer the differences
> between the procedure and expected results of the VO tests on top of the
> existing non-VO tests, and highlight those differences (e.g., in bold make a
> note that says "For VO: ...").
>
> For instance,
>
> Test 1: Home page load
> Procedure:
>    1. Load the application and tap on "English" at the language selection
> screen. (*For VO: Load the web app by opening the page in Safari."*)
>    2. *For VO: Have VoiveOver read through the page.*
> Expected results:
>   ... (the same for both non-VO and VO)
>
> Justin, do you have any thoughts or suggestions? (Justin was the one who
> wrote the other Fluid QA test plans)
>
> Cheers,
> James
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar <
> sambhavic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Alison & James,
>>
>> Please take a look at the first three items under Fluid Engage 0.3 at
>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Testing+Fluid+Components where
>> I have replicated and modified (at the end of each section) tests for use of
>> Engage with VoiceOver. Let me have your feedback whether I could continue
>> similarly for the rest.
>>
>> Alison, thank you so much for your assistance. Are you available for a
>> quick chat any time today?
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Alison Benjamin <
>> alison.benjamin at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Please let me know if I can be of any assistance with this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alison
>>>
>>> On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you, James. I will look into that and check with what I have. Will
>>> email you for assistance with integration.
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:10 PM, James William Yoon <
>>> james.yoon at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sam,
>>>>
>>>> Tona and I have completed writing our first draft of the QA test plans,
>>>> found under "Fluid Engage 0.3" on the right side here:
>>>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Testing+Fluid+Components
>>>>
>>>> Let us know where you're at with yours, and how we can assist you in
>>>> integrating the accessibility test plans into there. (QA testing begins on
>>>> Tuesday)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar <
>>>> sambhavic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi James,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will join you both on Wednesday next (Feb 10th). Will mail you on Wed
>>>>> morning about what I get done up to that point. We can then discuss how to
>>>>> align/integrate the tests with/into the main QA plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sam
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:56 AM, James William Yoon <
>>>>> james.yoon at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm glad you brought this up. I had just pinged Justin about this
>>>>>> minutes ago. Tona and I are more than happy to lend our assistance in
>>>>>> writing the QA test plans. We'll work on this early next week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone else wanting to help us write the test plans and/or gain some
>>>>>> experience writing them is welcome to join us!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Colin Clark <colinbdclark at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi James and Tona,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm wondering if you might be able to lend a hand with preparations
>>>>>>> for Engage 0.3 quality assurance testing. Justin is pretty heads-down with
>>>>>>> development tasks, so I don't think he's going to have a chance to create
>>>>>>> all of the test plans we need to have in place before we start the QA phase
>>>>>>> on February 16.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm wondering if you two are willing to help create these test plans,
>>>>>>> with some advice and moral support from Justin and crew as needed? Ideally,
>>>>>>> we'll try to get these finished by late next week so we have time to refine
>>>>>>> them before QA actually starts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sam is working on a screenreader-specific QA test plan as well, so
>>>>>>> it'd be worth syncing up everyone on this as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Colin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Colin Clark
>>>>>>> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
>>>>>>> http://fluidproject.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>>>>>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20100216/cd21dad8/attachment.html>