QA test plans for Engage 0.3 beta

[James William Yoon]

Hi Sam,

I took a read through the the QA test plans for VoiceOver you wrote. It
seems to me that, with one or two exceptions, all the tests are
identical--even with the one or two exceptions, the difference is often just
an extra line in the procedure indicating that the test should be run
directly in Safari.

I wonder if it would make better sense simply to layer the differences
between the procedure and expected results of the VO tests on top of the
existing non-VO tests, and highlight those differences (e.g., in bold make a
note that says "For VO: ...").

For instance,

Test 1: Home page load
Procedure:
   1. Load the application and tap on "English" at the language selection
screen. (*For VO: Load the web app by opening the page in Safari."*)
   2. *For VO: Have VoiveOver read through the page.*
Expected results:
  ... (the same for both non-VO and VO)

Justin, do you have any thoughts or suggestions? (Justin was the one who
wrote the other Fluid QA test plans)

Cheers,
James

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar <
sambhavic at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alison & James,
>
> Please take a look at the first three items under Fluid Engage 0.3 at
> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Testing+Fluid+Components where
> I have replicated and modified (at the end of each section) tests for use of
> Engage with VoiceOver. Let me have your feedback whether I could continue
> similarly for the rest.
>
> Alison, thank you so much for your assistance. Are you available for a
> quick chat any time today?
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Alison Benjamin <
> alison.benjamin at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> Please let me know if I can be of any assistance with this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alison
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, James. I will look into that and check with what I have. Will
>> email you for assistance with integration.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:10 PM, James William Yoon <
>> james.yoon at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sam,
>>>
>>> Tona and I have completed writing our first draft of the QA test plans,
>>> found under "Fluid Engage 0.3" on the right side here:
>>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Testing+Fluid+Components
>>>
>>> Let us know where you're at with yours, and how we can assist you in
>>> integrating the accessibility test plans into there. (QA testing begins on
>>> Tuesday)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Sambhavi Chandrashekar <
>>> sambhavic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi James,
>>>>
>>>> I will join you both on Wednesday next (Feb 10th). Will mail you on Wed
>>>> morning about what I get done up to that point. We can then discuss how to
>>>> align/integrate the tests with/into the main QA plan.
>>>>
>>>> Sam
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:56 AM, James William Yoon <
>>>> james.yoon at utoronto.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm glad you brought this up. I had just pinged Justin about this
>>>>> minutes ago. Tona and I are more than happy to lend our assistance in
>>>>> writing the QA test plans. We'll work on this early next week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else wanting to help us write the test plans and/or gain some
>>>>> experience writing them is welcome to join us!
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> James
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Colin Clark <colinbdclark at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi James and Tona,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm wondering if you might be able to lend a hand with preparations
>>>>>> for Engage 0.3 quality assurance testing. Justin is pretty heads-down with
>>>>>> development tasks, so I don't think he's going to have a chance to create
>>>>>> all of the test plans we need to have in place before we start the QA phase
>>>>>> on February 16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm wondering if you two are willing to help create these test plans,
>>>>>> with some advice and moral support from Justin and crew as needed? Ideally,
>>>>>> we'll try to get these finished by late next week so we have time to refine
>>>>>> them before QA actually starts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sam is working on a screenreader-specific QA test plan as well, so
>>>>>> it'd be worth syncing up everyone on this as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me know what you think,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Colin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Colin Clark
>>>>>> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
>>>>>> http://fluidproject.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________
>>>>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>>>>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20100212/01cbf141/attachment.html>