possible release time line change proposed
Jess Mitchell
jess at jessmitchell.com
Mon Mar 23 18:53:31 UTC 2009
Thanks for this. I'm rooting for us!
J
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at jessmitchell.com
/ w / 617.326.7753 / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com
http://www.fluidproject.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Mar 23, 2009, at 8:32 AM, Justin wrote:
> Hi Colin,
>
> Thanks, this sounds good to me. I like the idea of having
> consistency across the board and adding that extra bit of polish
> before we release.
>
> I'll update the calendar and send out some e-mails to update
> everyone on the changed dates for the bug parade and testing.
>
> thanks
> Justin
> On 20-Mar-09, at 5:10 PM, Colin Clark wrote:
>
>> Justin,
>>
>> I think this makes a lot of sense. Bug squashing is moving along a
>> feverish pace, but we've been lagging behind a bit in terms of
>> reviewing patches as they are posted. An extra day would help
>> ensure that our code quality stays high.
>>
>> With this in mind, there are a few other interesting topics that
>> are emerging during the parade. I've been working on the new build
>> scripts for Infusion 1.0 based on Simon Wang's patch. There are
>> some interesting layers of complexity to this work, touching on a
>> previous discussion we had on list about whether to modify our
>> directory structure so that assets for a component are more self-
>> contained.
>>
>> One of our core goals for the 1.0 release is ensuring consistency
>> across the board. For example, our decision to normalize class
>> names across all components and the FSS. There's probably a bit
>> more "i crossing" and "t dotting" left to be done. These sorts of
>> changes cross-cutting changes are easier to do when we aren't
>> fixing bugs and managing patches.
>>
>> I'd like to propose that we extend our release by a week to give us
>> time to tweak and test our build scripts and ensure that we're
>> consistent across the board in terms of class names, directory
>> layout, and so on. That little bit of extra polish that comes with
>> a 1.0 release.
>>
>> Here's my proposed timeline:
>>
>> Bug parade: last day is March 24
>> i-dotting/t-crossing parade: March 25-30
>> Completely code freeze: March 31
>> Release: April 7
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Colin
>>
>> On 20-Mar-09, at 4:47 PM, Justin wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Bug-parade is moving along well, but could use another day to get
>>> fixes in and have time to complete code reviews and testing.
>>>
>>> This would require the shifting of code freeze and the release date.
>>>
>>> Current Timeline
>>>
>>> Bug Parade: last day is March 23
>>> Code Freeze: March 24
>>> Release: March 31
>>>
>>> I would like to add a day to the bug parade, but would still need
>>> the four days for testing. I'm not sure it is a good idea to
>>> release on April 1st and there may be some issues that will take
>>> longer to properly fix.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any dates that they think would make sense and be
>>> acceptable.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Justin
>>> Justin
>>
>> ---
>> Colin Clark
>> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
>> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
>> http://fluidproject.org
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090323/87d8865c/attachment.html>
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list