SWFUpload Word of warning
Ian Boston
ieb at tfd.co.uk
Fri Mar 7 14:40:10 UTC 2008
The guys at Caret have done some further investigation and discovered
this.
http://swfupload.org/forum/generaldiscussion/383
It may be possible to work around the cookie bug, but the long list
of complaints about flash.net.FileRefernce.upload on the adobe site
worries me a bit.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/8/main/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/
wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Parts&file=00002204.html
Things like,
if you give it https://camtools.caret.cam.ac.uk/ it changes the
url to https://camtools.caret.cam.ac.uk:80/ which is wrong (not SSL).
You can work around by forcing the URL to https://
camtools.caret.cam.ac.uk:443/
Perhaps all of these have been worked around in SWFUpload, but the
proxy thing is still a worry for me.... since they clearly are not
using the Browser transport, and that certainly will cause a problem
in FF which manages its own proxy separate from the OS on most
platforms.
If this post is not of relevance to fluid and I should post it
somewhere else, please just say.
Ian
On 7 Mar 2008, at 08:52, Ian Boston wrote:
> Word of warning about SWFUpload.
>
> I have been doing some tests on Sakai, and on OSX Firefox at least,
> it does not appear to use the browser http channel.
>
> a) No cookies from the browser are coming through on the
> SWFConnection. (so the connection doesn't appear to be logged in to
> Sakai)
> b) Firebug does not show it up on the network activity.
>
> If this is true, and the case for all browsers SWFUpload will
> require that the security and proxy settings are transfered from
> the browser to SWFUpload before it will work in a secure
> environment. Transferring cookies is probably built in, but proxy
> settings may be harder. It may also have problems with client side
> SSO (eg Kerberos etc)
>
> Has anyone else seen this behavior or had to do anything special to
> make it work with Sakai ?
>
> Ian
>
>
>
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list