Feedback please - what should the new documentation platform be called?
Jonathan Hung
jhung at ocadu.ca
Wed Jul 15 11:00:45 EDT 2015
One reason to have two repositories is to separate "the stuff a user would
customize" from the rest.
Also, by setting it up as two repositories, we use Node.js to get
Repository #1. So when a developer works from a clone of Repository #2, all
the dependencies are contained within the node_modules directory. It just
makes the distinction a little more explicit and works more like a "themes
+ plugins" style of web development.
Not sure if that helps. Perhaps Simon can elaborate more?
- Jon.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia <acheetham at ocadu.ca>
wrote:
>
> Jon and Simon, it’s great to see this work happening – thanks for getting
> it going! It’s going to make managing our multiple sites easier.
>
> A couple of questions, to help clarify my brainstorming on names:
>
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Jonathan Hung <jhung at ocadu.ca> wrote:
>
> two repositories.
>
> Repository #1: Helpers
> Repository #2: Starting Content
>
>
> Repository #2 depends on Repository #1 in order to function.
>
>
> What is the reasoning behind two repositories, and not just one? Is
> there a use case for a site using only #1, and not #2?
>
> --
> Anastasia Cheetham – acheetham at ocadu.ca
> Inclusive Design Research Centre
> Inclusive Design Institute
> OCAD University
>
>
--
*JONATHAN HUNG*
INCLUSIVE DESIGNER, IDRC
*T:* 416 977 6000 x3951
*F:* 416 977 9844
*E:* jhung at ocadu.ca
*OCAD UNIVERSITY*
Inclusive Design Research Centre
205 Richmond Street W, Toronto, ON, M5V 1V3
www.ocadu.ca
www.idrc.ocad.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20150715/a30e57eb/attachment.html>
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list