Feedback please - what should the new documentation platform be called?

Jonathan Hung jhung at ocadu.ca
Wed Jul 15 11:00:45 EDT 2015


One reason to have two repositories is to separate "the stuff a user would
customize" from the rest.

Also, by setting it up as two repositories, we use Node.js to get
Repository #1. So when a developer works from a clone of Repository #2, all
the dependencies are contained within the node_modules directory. It just
makes the distinction a little more explicit and works more like a "themes
+ plugins" style of web development.

Not sure if that helps. Perhaps Simon can elaborate more?

- Jon.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Cheetham, Anastasia <acheetham at ocadu.ca>
wrote:

>
>  Jon and Simon, it’s great to see this work happening – thanks for getting
> it going! It’s going to make managing our multiple sites easier.
>
>  A couple of questions, to help clarify my brainstorming on names:
>
>  On Jul 15, 2015, at 8:50 AM, Jonathan Hung <jhung at ocadu.ca> wrote:
>
>  two repositories.
>
>  Repository #1: Helpers
>  Repository #2: Starting Content
>
>
>   Repository #2 depends on Repository #1 in order to function.
>
>
>  What is the reasoning behind two repositories, and not just one? Is
> there a use case for a site using only #1, and not #2?
>
>     --
> Anastasia Cheetham – acheetham at ocadu.ca
> Inclusive Design Research Centre
> Inclusive Design Institute
> OCAD University
>
>


-- 

*JONATHAN HUNG*

INCLUSIVE DESIGNER, IDRC



*T:* 416 977 6000 x3951

*F:* 416 977 9844

*E:* jhung at ocadu.ca



*OCAD UNIVERSITY*

Inclusive Design Research Centre

205 Richmond Street W, Toronto, ON, M5V 1V3



www.ocadu.ca

www.idrc.ocad.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20150715/a30e57eb/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list