Fluid Engage - Ideal accessible interaction for code entry

James William Yoon james.yoon at utoronto.ca
Tue Feb 23 16:31:22 UTC 2010


On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 AM, E.J. Zufelt <everett at zufelt.ca> wrote:

> Comments:
>
> 1. Although the keypad was reasonably easy for me to use, the buttons are
> much smaller than the buttons on the iPhone keypad (at least as VO
> recognizes them), this * might * cause a problem for others.
>

Our code entry keypad is the same size (pixel-for-pixel) as the unlock
keypad on the iPhone. I do see that the iPhone's dialing keypad is slightly
larger though. We'll take this feedback into account when designing the next
iteration of the keypad.


> 2. Someone should verify that visually the numbering on the buttons is of a
> sufficient size to make them easy to read for low vision users, that the
> display works correctly with iPhone built-in magnifier, and that colours
> pass the WCAG 2.0 contrast criteria.  Should probably do this last step for
> all UIs
>

Duly noted. We'll look into this.

Also, preliminary testing shows that the application works great with the
built-in screen magnifier.

3. I am not sure if the automatic redirect to the artifact page is expected
> behavior after a code has been entered, but if it is then some steps need to
> be taken to conform with WCAG 2.0 priority A:
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/time-limits-required-behaviors.html
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/consistent-behavior-unpredictable-change.html
>

Filed as: ENGAGE-440 <http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/ENGAGE-440>

Thanks, Everett!

James
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20100223/6948240a/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list