Related artifacts relating to artifacts outside the exhibition--design or error?

[Yura]

I guess the only thing to specify here is that not withing the same 
exhibition means that artifacts are not in the list of artifacts for 
specific exhibition (in these case these "outsider" artifacts can 
sometimes be found in the lists of related artifacts for some 
artifacts). Hopefully it helps and not confuses even more.

Regards,

Yura

James William Yoon wrote:
> Hi Hugues,
>
> Yura already pinged you about this from one point of view (re: 
> "Related Artifact thumbnails"), but here's another:
>
> Some of the artifacts you list as related to a pivot artifact point to 
> artifacts that are not within the same exhibition, or even a current 
> exhibition. Some things that arise from this are:
> 1. Is this intentional? Specifically, does it make sense for a user 
> who's browsing the current exhibitions catalogue or looking at an 
> artifact in front of him at the museum to discover an artifact that's 
> in storage? I imagine this is something user testing can shed light 
> on, but... (see next point)
> 2. Is this required for 0.3? The developers have estimated that it'll 
> take a few hours to implement (our DB currently only holds artifacts 
> that were crawled through from the exhibitions catalogues and not 
> outside; the adjustment will take time). Given the limited time we 
> have left before QA testing and the pilot, is relating artifacts to 
> artifacts outside current exhibitions a priority?
> 3. Relating artifacts to artifacts inside a current exhibition is not 
> an issue.
>
> (Yura and Colin, if I'm missing stuff here or got something wrong, 
> please add/correct!)
>
> Cheers,
> James