Proposed design svn structure
Leah Maestri
leahmaestri at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 21:55:21 UTC 2009
Hi James,
This looks really good. The only question I have is for the first 4
directories. It goes svn/, then design/, then engage/... etc. Is the reason
for why *design/* lives outside of *engage/* because it's more related to
the entire fluid project and not specific to *engage/*? I guess in my mind
all the design work that we're doing is within *engage/*. Correct me if I'm
wrong.
What about materials from conferences (i.e: powerpoints, papers, etc.) would
that go under one of the following?
Great stuff!
Lee
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:49 PM, James William Yoon
<james.yoon at utoronto.ca>wrote:
> Hello all (but especially designers, since this affects you most!),
>
> Vicki and I spent the afternoon thinking about the sorts of files we
> have as FE designers (wireframes, stencils, pixel-perfect mockups,
> fonts, academic literature on UX/IxD and museum stuff, museum maps,
> testing protocols, ethics and consent forms, the journey frameworks
> and ontology, etc.), and then hacked away at the structure of our
> design svn.
>
> Here's what we're proposing:
>
> /svn (the root)
> /design (where the designers live)
> /engage (where Fluid Engage lives)
> /admin (general administrative files--project
> description, contact info, etc.)
> /mobile (mobile micro-project)
> /wireframes
> /high-fidelity-mockups
> /interaction-flow-diagrams
> /stencils (mobile wireframes toolkit)
> /mobile-design-testing-platform
> /kiosk (kiosk micro-project)
> /wireframes
> /high-fidelity-mockups
> /stencils (kiosk wireframes toolkit)
> /resources (general designer toolkit and other
> Engage-specific resources)
> /museum-maps
> /detroit-institute-of-arts
> /mccord-museum
> /museum-of-the-moving-image
> /stencils
> /fonts
> /process (design process stuff, like the Journey
> Frameworks and Ontology)
> /journey-frameworks
> /ontology
> /etc (everything else)
> /decapod (where Fluid Decapod lives, if they so desired)
> ...
> /collection-space (where CSpace lives, if they so desired)
> ...
>
> Your thoughts, questions, and suggestions would be very helpful. In
> particular, ask yourselves whether you have (or will have) files that
> don't fit under this structure, and, more importantly, whether this
> structure makes sense to you.
>
> Developers, you all have much more experience than us in svn--does the
> structure make sense? Any potential svn snafus we should be aware of?
>
> Cheers,
> James
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20091016/b0196159/attachment.html>
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list