SVN still frozen: Restructuring update

[Justin]

Okay, I'm going to remove it from the clean-up parade.

Thanks
Justin
On 30-Mar-09, at 10:29 AM, Colin Clark wrote:

> Hey,
>
> On 27-Mar-09, at 9:32 AM, Anastasia Cheetham wrote:
>
>> On 27-Mar-09, at 8:32 AM, Justin wrote:
>>
>>> One thing that we forgot about in our svn restructuring meeting  
>>> was the need for a licenses directory.  ( http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-1943 
>>>  ).
>>
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, this can probably be taken care  
>> of later, but it's good to remember it.
>>
>> I've made a comment on the issue, asking a question about it.
>
> Just to clarify, this issue doesn't actually require us to move  
> around the license files within SVN. We'll want to stick with our  
> current scheme, which I think is pretty sensible. A top-level  
> LICENSE.txt file is included in the repository, and then individual  
> directories can contain a LICENSE file that overrides the standard  
> licensing scheme.
>
> The issue is one of deployment: we assume that the product of our  
> build is a set of directories you can drop right into a web server  
> and start using. Deploying licenses alongside the JavaScript is  
> unnecessary, so as part of the build process we can move licenses  
> around or strip the files out completely.
>
> This is an issue we can punt for Infusion 1.0.
>
> Colin
>
> ---
> Colin Clark
> Technical Lead, Fluid Project
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
> http://fluidproject.org
>