Renaming the Functional Examples

Colin Clark colin.clark at utoronto.ca
Sun Mar 29 14:02:07 UTC 2009


John,

On 29-Mar-09, at 6:15 AM, John Norman wrote:

> I saw "Starting Points" and wondered what it meant. I would have had  
> the same issue with "Springboards". Now you say these are names for  
> Functional Examples, I have an idea what to expect and why I might  
> want to go look at one. This suggests to me that "Functional  
> Examples" might be the *useful* name. Less exotic of course...
>
> Once you go to one and see what it is you will learn the intended  
> meaning quickly, but why add that load to the visitor?

Great feedback. I guess this highlights the problem with the name  
Functional Examples. We're talking here about chunks of simple HTML  
and JavaScript code used to get developers up and running with  
Infusion. They're designed to be looked at, dissected, and used as a  
starting point for your own development. As such, they make for less  
compelling examples of our functionality, since they're stripped down  
to show key concepts.

Given this description, is this what you were expecting a Functional  
Example to provide you with? If not, any suggestions for alternative  
names?

Colin



---
Colin Clark
Technical Lead, Fluid Project
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre, University of Toronto
http://fluidproject.org




More information about the fluid-work mailing list