Question about manual test pages
Anastasia Cheetham
a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Fri Mar 27 16:09:16 UTC 2009
> Remove:
> Inline Edit: Simple Text
We should double-check whether or not the starting-point actually
covers all of the possible configurations covered by this manual test
before deleting it.
> Remove:
> Reorderer: Simple Grid
>
> Remove:
> Reorderer: Nested Reorderers
Do we have any other example of nested reorderers? If not, we
shouldn't delete this - we should clean it up and promote it.
> Don't know:
> Renderer: Component-types
This is not ready for promotion yet, but I think it should continue to
exist. It's been helpful for my learning, and will probably serve as a
starting point for promotion soon.
> Don't know:
> Renderer: Object-data-entry
Toss it.
> Don't know:
> Renderer: Radio Buttons
> Renderer: Test Renderer
> Renderer: Tree Generation
I'd appreciate it if these weren't tossed. Maybe all of these renderer
files should be moved into the sandbox, if we want to get rid of
manual test files??
--
Anastasia Cheetham a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Software Designer, Fluid Project http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list