Question about manual test pages

Anastasia Cheetham a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Fri Mar 27 16:09:16 UTC 2009


> Remove:
> Inline Edit: Simple Text

We should double-check whether or not the starting-point actually  
covers all of the possible configurations covered by this manual test  
before deleting it.


> Remove:
> Reorderer: Simple Grid
>


> Remove:
> Reorderer: Nested Reorderers

Do we have any other example of nested reorderers? If not, we  
shouldn't delete this - we should clean it up and promote it.


> Don't know:
> Renderer: Component-types

This is not ready for promotion yet, but I think it should continue to  
exist. It's been helpful for my learning, and will probably serve as a  
starting point for promotion soon.

> Don't know:
> Renderer: Object-data-entry

Toss it.

> Don't know:
> Renderer: Radio Buttons
> Renderer: Test Renderer
> Renderer: Tree Generation

I'd appreciate it if these weren't tossed. Maybe all of these renderer  
files should be moved into the sandbox, if we want to get rid of  
manual test files??


-- 
Anastasia Cheetham                   a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
Software Designer, Fluid Project    http://fluidproject.org
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto




More information about the fluid-work mailing list