Question about manual test pages

[Eli Cochran]

This plan looks good.

If I have time, I'd like to turn the Progress manual tests into a  
sample page that goes along with some new Progress documentation.

Of course, after release.

- Eli

On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Justin wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Here are my thoughts about what to do with some of the manual test  
> pages.
>
> Link to build site: http://build.fluidproject.org/manual-tests.html
>
> Keep:
>
> FSS Tests (All)
>
> Uploader: Scroller
> Reorderer: Multiple Reorderers
>
> Remove:
>
> Inline Edit: Simple Text
> UI Options: Table of Contents
> Uploader: Progress bar
> Layout Reorderer: Simple Portlets
> Layout Reorderer: Portlets with permissions
> Reorderer: Simple List
> Reorderer: Simple Grid
> Reorderer: Nested Reorderers
> jQuery UI Focus Tests ( http://build.fluidproject.org/fluid/tests/jquery-tests/manual/jQueryUI-focus-test.html 
>  )
>
>
> Promote (after release):
>
> Inline Edit: Rich Text
> Inline Edit: Dropdown
> Reorderer: Table Rows
>
> Don't know:
>
> Renderer: Component-types
> Renderer: Object-data-entry
> Renderer: Radio Buttons
> Renderer: Test Renderer
> Renderer: Tree Generation
> Menu Bar
> Versioning ( http://build.fluidproject.org/fluid/tests/fluid-tests/manual/versioning/list.html 
>  )
> Anchors ( http://build.fluidproject.org/fluid/tests/jquery-tests/manual/anchors.html 
>  )
>
> On 20-Mar-09, at 4:39 PM, Justin wrote:
>
>> That would be an interesting case, and seems to define in a way  
>> what the Manual test should be. Tests which are not representable  
>> as unit tests. If a page does not meet this criteria, maybe it  
>> should be moved or remade as I mentioned in the previous e-mail.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Justin
>>
>> On 20-Mar-09, at 4:33 PM, Jacob Farber wrote:
>>
>>> So how would we deal with the CSS "tests"? Im not sure it would  
>>> work as a sample page.
>>>
>>> From: fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org [fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org 
>>> ] On Behalf Of Justin [justin.obara at utoronto.ca]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:24 PM
>>> To: Fluid Work
>>> Subject: Question about manual test pages
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> There is a jira on bug parade about needing to re-evaluate the use  
>>> and need for manual test pages.
>>>
>>> FLUID-2333:
>>> Re-evaluate the need and use of manual tests
>>> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-2333
>>>
>>> The main question here is, should the manual tests be included in  
>>> the release bundle?
>>>
>>> It would seem that manual tests should be converted to unit tests,  
>>> where possible. If the manual test shows some important  
>>> functionality, maybe it should be promoted to a full fledged  
>>> sample-page.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

. . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .

Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090326/8f10ec49/attachment.html>