Image Reorderer protocol ready for review...

Allison Bloodworth abloodworth at berkeley.edu
Thu Mar 26 00:54:24 UTC 2009


Hi Paul,

I believe you've found a bug! The red drop target should always tell  
users where the item will fall--when it doesn't that's definitely a  
bug. In http://build.fluidproject.org/fluid/sample-code/reorderer/image-reorderer/image-reorderer.html 
, I verified that if I hold an image too far to the right *only when  
moving it downwards* (just like you found) it doesn't drop where the  
red drop target indicates it will.

This seems like a pretty important bug -- is it something we should  
try to fix before the release?

Cheers,
Allison

On Mar 25, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Paul Zablosky wrote:

> Hi Daphne,
>     I tried to perform the tasks in the Round 1 protocol, and I must  
> say I completely failed at task 2.  Well, not completely, but it  
> took me many minutes to figure out how to perform it reliably.  I'm  
> sure that no tester would have given me enough time.
>
> If I have the fruit images in two rows, it is really easy to move  
> any of the second row images to the centre of the first.  If there  
> are seven images in Row 1, I simply select any second row image and  
> place the target after Row 1, Image 3.  It doesn't matter how the  
> avatar is positioned -- if the target is to the right of Image 3, my  
> selection drops into the middle.  I also notice that the target is a  
> good indicator of which images the one being moved will fall  
> between.  That is, if the target is between the blackberry and  
> cherry, that's where the one I'm moving ends up -- between the  
> blackberry and the cherry.
>
> So far, so good.  My success at moving images from Row 2 to Row 1 is  
> so confidence-inspiring that I decide to move an image from Row 1  
> into Row 2. Should sort of work the same, shouldn't it?  (Now I know  
> that it won't  quite be the same, because I know that I'm really  
> operating on a one dimensional list, not a grid.  So things will  
> rearrange themselves to fill gaps, but I let my sense of having  
> learned something in the first trial carry over.)
>
> Now what happens? Well first of all, I find that the position of the  
> target causes rather different behaviour.  If  I place the avatar  
> over the image currently in the centre of Row 2, it doesn't seem to  
> matter which side of it the target is on.  The current centre image  
> moves to the left and the one I'm moving takes the centre position.   
> So, I sort of know how to get my image into the centre, but I'm  
> totally confused about how to get my image between two others.  The  
> "between-ness" rule I had inferred from the previous trial doesn't  
> work any more.
>
> So I experiment a bit an suddenly find that things aren't dropping  
> where I expect.  I'm totally confused until I notice that the  
> relative positions of the avatar and the target are important with  
> this kind of move (Row 1 to Row 2).  If the centre of the avatar is  
> a bit to the left of the target, the image ends up on the left side,  
> and if it's a little bit to the right, the image ends up on the  
> right side.  The rule I now infer is "the image my avatar is  
> hovering over will scoot to the left, and my image will replace it  
> --  the position of the target doesn't really matter.  This is a lot  
> different from "a gap will open up where the target is now, and my  
> image will go in between".
>
> So I end up with two rules:
> When I move things up, the position of the target tells me where  
> they will fall.
> When I move things down the position of the avatar tells me where  
> they will fall.
> I'd be embarrassed to tell you how long it took me to figure this  
> out.  I hope your test subjects are able to catch on a bit quicker  
> than me.
>
> One other thing I noticed which you may want to control for while  
> testing. If you resize the window so that the rows have an even  
> number of images, the "middle" is less well-defined than if you have  
> an odd number..
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> Daphne Ogle wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/Image+Reorderer+User+Testing+-+Round+1
>>
>> Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Daphne Ogle
>> Senior Interaction Designer
>> University of California, Berkeley
>> Educational Technology Services
>> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
>> cell (510)847-0308
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

Allison Bloodworth
Senior User Interaction Designer
Educational Technology Services
University of California, Berkeley
(415) 377-8243
abloodworth at berkeley.edu




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090325/3be65bd1/attachment.html>


More information about the fluid-work mailing list