Question about manual test pages

[Justin]

That would be an interesting case, and seems to define in a way what  
the Manual test should be. Tests which are not representable as unit  
tests. If a page does not meet this criteria, maybe it should be moved  
or remade as I mentioned in the previous e-mail.

Thanks
Justin

On 20-Mar-09, at 4:33 PM, Jacob Farber wrote:

> So how would we deal with the CSS "tests"? Im not sure it would work  
> as a sample page.
>
> From: fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org [fluid-work-bounces at fluidproject.org 
> ] On Behalf Of Justin [justin.obara at utoronto.ca]
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:24 PM
> To: Fluid Work
> Subject: Question about manual test pages
>
> Hello,
>
> There is a jira on bug parade about needing to re-evaluate the use  
> and need for manual test pages.
>
> FLUID-2333:
> Re-evaluate the need and use of manual tests
> http://issues.fluidproject.org/browse/FLUID-2333
>
> The main question here is, should the manual tests be included in  
> the release bundle?
>
> It would seem that manual tests should be converted to unit tests,  
> where possible. If the manual test shows some important  
> functionality, maybe it should be promoted to a full fledged sample- 
> page.
>
> Any thoughts?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090320/b95ff1f1/attachment.html>