www or not?

[Laurel A. Williams]

Sorry if it wasn't clear.

http://fluidproject.org is the standard.

Laurel

Jess Mitchell wrote:
> so, which one is the "standard"?
>
> J
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Jess Mitchell
> Boston, MA, USA
> Project Manager / Fluid Project
> jess at jessmitchell.com <mailto:jess at jessmitchell.com>
> / w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
> jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com <mailto:jessmitchell at gmail.com>
> http://www.fluidproject.org
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Laurel A. Williams wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Colin and I had a discussion about the website URL and discussed 
>> standardizing it to http://fluidproject.org (not www.fluidproject.org 
>> <http://www.fluidproject.org>). This discussion came up as a result 
>> of me trying to get UI Options working for both URLs. When I asked 
>> about it, Jamon recommended using one URL for Search Engine Optimization.
>>
>> We noted it would be necessary to maintain a redirect on the www 
>> version of the URL.
>>
>> I am in the process of reviewing the website to ensure there are no 
>> references to the www URL in the links, etc. As you are going about 
>> your wiki edits, and other activities please edit any website links 
>> that you come across to reflect this standard.
>>
>> Laurel
>>
>> -- 
>> Laurel A. Williams
>> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
>> University of Toronto
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org 
>> <mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>

-- 
Laurel A. Williams
Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
University of Toronto