UX Toolkit. Whaa?
Steven Githens
swgithen at mtu.edu
Thu Jan 29 17:25:33 UTC 2009
electBlake wrote:
> Until this thread I always though UX Toolkit was a User Experience JS
> Testing Suite - ha!
>
Yeah, I thought it was maybe a bundle of Fluid-all.js that included some
other javascript libraries to add more widgets.
-s
> How about Fluid Design Book? Or Something with "Book" ?
>
> I've always like calling things "Books" (seobook.com for instance) it
> just gives the air of "yes, we know what we're doing, so much so that
> we have written a book!"
>
> B
>
> On 29-Jan-09, at 11:57 AM, Jess Mitchell wrote:
>
>> I agree!
>>
>> Fluid Design Guidelines
>> Fluid Design Tools
>> Fluid Design Resources
>> Fluid Design How-Tos
>> Fluid Design How-To Guide
>>
>> Doing the shotgun approach hoping that someone strikes down most of
>> what I'm proposing and comes up with something much more brilliant.
>>
>> J
>>
>>
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Jess Mitchell
>> Boston, MA, USA
>> Project Manager / Fluid Project
>> jess at jessmitchell.com <mailto:jess at jessmitchell.com>
>> / w / 617.326.7753 / c / 919.599.5378
>> jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com <mailto:jessmitchell at gmail.com>
>> http://www.fluidproject.org
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Jacob Farber wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> I agree. "Toolkit" sounds like exactly that - if Im not interested
>>> in learning how to use a new "tool" then I would never explore it.
>>> I would miss out on a wealth of research information and guidlines.
>>> Jacob
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Erin Yu <erin.yu at utoronto.ca
>>> <mailto:erin.yu at utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> As I was reorganizing the Fluid website, I was reminded of the
>>> unintuitiveness(!) of the name "UX Toolkit". Some of the new
>>> members our team were confused by the name as I was when I first
>>> heard it.
>>>
>>> General reactions were:
>>> "What is UX?"
>>> "Toolkit sounds like it's something technical. Something
>>> developers would use."
>>> "Toolkit for user experience. What could it be... Is it like
>>> diagrams?"
>>>
>>> If I was looking for information on say, "how to do user
>>> testing", I would never think to click on something called "UX
>>> Toolkit". We have great stuff in UX Toolkit, and I think it will
>>> be seen and used more if the name was more intuitive, perhaps
>>> something like "Design Guidelines".
>>>
>>> What do others think?
>>>
>>> Erin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>> <mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jacob Farber
>>> University of Toronto - ATRC
>>> Tel: (416) 946-3002
>>> www.fluidproject.org <http://www.fluidproject.org>
>>> _______________________________________________________
>>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>>> <mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>>
>> _______________________________________________________
>> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
>> <mailto:fluid-work at fluidproject.org>
>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
More information about the fluid-work
mailing list