refreshed website soft launched

[Jess Mitchell]

So, let's hold off on voting for font size just yet -- Erin and I just  
had a chat and she's going to have a look into what a font size subtle  
change would look like and Laurel is looking into browser activity  
(let's add to that increasing size of font and how well they do that).

We'd like to stay above the fold -- don't forget to look at this on  
small screens too! -- and have a fairly sized font.

We'll get it -- we're iterating!

Best,
Jess

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jess Mitchell
Boston, MA, USA
Project Manager / Fluid Project
jess at jessmitchell.com
/ w / 617.326.7753  / c / 919.599.5378
jabber: jessmitchell at gmail.com
http://www.fluidproject.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Laurel A. Williams wrote:

> +1 - I also find it hard to read, and I'm the one who implemented it!
>
> But decreasing the font size was a high priority when we did the new  
> site design...so I'd like to know if  there is anyone out there who  
> thinks the font size is just fine?
>
> Laurel
>
> Allison Bloodworth wrote:
>> I have to agree with Anastasia that the font is a bit small. (I'd  
>> probably even make the font on the top-nav bigger.)
>
> -- 
> Laurel A. Williams
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre
> University of Toronto
>
> _______________________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list - fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives,
> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090225/50ea0b92/attachment.html>