Fluid UX Walkthrough protocol - reorganized, looking for feedback.

[Paul Zablosky]

Hi Jonathan,
    Your "Fluid UX Walkthrough" page looks good.  I agree that there's a 
lot of material, and it's a bit dense, but the idea was to capture the 
Fluid approach all in one page, and I think you have done it.   The 
question remains: are we going to provide pages on the individual 
techniques as well as the bundled description?

With our current page hierarchy, which looks something like this:

    * User Experience Walkthroughs
          o Fluid UX Walkthrough
          o UX Walkthrough Preparation and Execution
          o UX Walkthrough Protocols and Checklists
                + Additional Questions for all reviewers
                + UX Walkthrough - Heuristic Evaluation
                + UX Walkthrough - Cognitive Walkthrough
                + ... other current children

we could enhance the top level page to give the user a choice -- they 
can either follow the Fluid way (with your new page), or they can just 
select one or more of the techniques.  I'm not committed to one way or 
the other -- I'd like to hear what others think about this.

Paul

Jonathan Hung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the effort to reorganize the UX Walkthrough protocol, I
> have made a draft revision of the UX Walkthrough Protocol and
> Checklist.
>
> Old version: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/x/VAEa
> New version: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/x/8QZa
>
> The new version attempts to deliver the following:
> 1. Convey the parallel nature of the Heuristic and Cognitive evaluations.
> 2. Incorporate accessibility heuristic and cognitive evaluations.
> 3. Lay out the walkthrough in a more check-list manner.
>
> All the content from the old version is present in the new version,
> but with some modifications where necessary.
>
> My concern is that the new document is a bit dense, but I hope that,
> in context of being a checklist / reference for executing a UX
> evaluation, the content density would be okay.
>
> Do you think the new version of the walkthrough is more beneficial to
> a would-be implementer compared to the old version? Are there areas
> for improvement? Any concerns?
>
> - Jonathan.
>
> ---
> Jonathan Hung / jhung.utoronto at gmail.com
> Fluid Project - ATRC at University of Toronto
> Tel: (416) 946-3002
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20090218/96caf0f0/attachment.html>