openVULab Readme - Does it make sense?

[electBlake]

Thanks Anastasia + jess, this is EXACTLY what I as looking for :)  
replies are inline below.

On 18-Feb-09, at 2:20 PM, Anastasia Cheetham wrote:

>
> On 18-Feb-09, at 1:33 PM, electBlake wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I took the fluid components readme and tweaked it to look  
>> more like a readme for VULab.
>> If you can take 10 minutes and give it a read over, and please  
>> voice any opinions, comments, critiques etc.
>
> Blake, this looks great!! Some general comments follow:
>
> - In the "What's in this Release" section, you start with "This  
> release is available in two forms" but then you only mention one file.
>

:) thanks for the heads up there! its basically a typo - I used the  
fluid component readme as a template, so I missed that change. It is  
only one file.

> - Does the deployment bundle actually include fluid- 
> components-0.7.war?

heh, no. another missed sentence from the old readme.

> - In the Source Code section, you bring up RASCAL, but there's no  
> previous mention of what it is, so I don't know what your comments  
> mean. I'd suggest adding a sentence or two about RASCAL and its  
> relationship to openVULab to the "What is openVULab" section.

Thats a great call. I'll add something in the "What is openVULab"  
section.

> - Does openVULab use the Fluid Uploader?
>

No, I assume your talking about the "Known Issues" section. I left  
that in as a placeholder, so I could add the known issues when we are  
ready for release. Its from the old readme.


> -- 
> Anastasia Cheetham                   a.cheetham at utoronto.ca
> Software Designer, Fluid Project    http://fluidproject.org
> Adaptive Technology Resource Centre / University of Toronto
>