Uploader refactoring and opacity

[Eli Cochran]

Oh, I forgot to mention that one thought I had was to pass in a  
formatting function so that if special formatting was needed for the  
Progress, it could be flexibly specified.

- Eli

On May 11, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Eli Cochran wrote:

> Michelle and Anastasia,
> Great work on refactoring the Uploader and Progress for multi- 
> instance. I'm walking through the changes and I'm very impressed.
>
> A couple of notes about the Progress.
>
> There is some code in Progress that does some tweaking to the format  
> of the Progress dialog. There is a comment there now that the code  
> should be moved to CSS. The reason the code is there is to make up  
> for problems in CSS.
>
> Specifically that the opacity setting is browser specific. We can  
> put it in CSS (and many people do) but then the CSS file will not  
> validate, so when dealing with CSS, I usually let jQuery deal with  
> it and handle the browser foo.
>
> The other fix there relates to the way that I'm building up the  
> feedback dialog. This could probably be factored out with a little  
> bit of work.
>
> - Eli
>
>
> . . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .
>
> Eli Cochran
> user interaction developer
> ETS, UC Berkeley
>
>

. . . . . . . . . . .  .  .   .    .      .         .              .                     .

Eli Cochran
user interaction developer
ETS, UC Berkeley


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20080511/1631298f/attachment.html>