GreenHopper?

Daphne Ogle daphne at media.berkeley.edu
Tue Dec 18 22:29:31 UTC 2007


Thanks for the response Peter!  I should have been more clear about  
the reason for including you on the email.

We are looking at this for use in Fluid planning.  I know you've had  
a lot of experience with what we can and can't use for free as an OSS  
so I was asking if you knew if these plug-ins were typically free.   
Sounds like that's a yes?

-Daphne

On Dec 18, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Knoop, Peter wrote:

> While GreenHopper offers some cool functionality, that  
> functionality is dependent on certain practices in Jira that Sakai  
> has not followed or deviated from with custom fields, so there  
> would have to be a bit of education and redesign as part of this.   
> For instance, almost no one uses the “In Progress” step in the  
> workflow; issues generally go from Open to Resolved.  Also, because  
> we have the extra, non-standard “Target Version” field, (rather  
> than Jira’s built-in expectation of relying on the combination of  
> the Status and Fixed Version to determine if an issue is planned  
> for a release or in a release), the drag-and-drop setting of  
> versions in GreenHopper probably won’t work quite right.
>
> So, if there are features here that you want to use in your own  
> project we can get it for free.  However, if you’re expecting  
> everyone in the Sakai project to use it, then we should run this by  
> the general audience first to see if the community is willing to  
> adapt its practices.
>
> -peter
>
> From: Allison Bloodworth [mailto:abloodworth at berkeley.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 2:32 PM
> To: Daphne Ogle
> Cc: Marc Brierley; Knoop, Peter; fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> Subject: Re: GreenHopper?
>
> Wow, this app does indeed seem incredibly cool from watching the  
> demo--thanks for the link, Marc! It sounds like we can use it for  
> free, too, since we are an open-source project. Perhaps we can talk  
> during our Thursday design team meeting about whether this is  
> something that team would like to try. The only question I have is  
> whether creating all design-related cards as separate JIRA issues  
> would clutter up JIRA too much...but perhaps we can have a separate  
> space in JIRA for design planning.
>
> Allison
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 5:42 PM, Daphne Ogle wrote:
>
>
> I don't think this was on our radar -- at least I didn't know about  
> it.   This looks great based on the video and would save a ton of  
> time synching jira with our cards.  And even allows us to do some  
> reporting!
>
> I wonder if plug-ons fall into the free to open source projects  
> category?  Peter, including you here in case you know.
>
> Thanks for pointing this our Marc!
>
> -Daphne
>
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Marc Brierley wrote:
>
>
> When you guys were thinking about a virtual story card system, did you
> look at GreenHopper?
> http://www.greenpeppersoftware.com/en/products/GreenHopper
> -mARC
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list
> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
> Daphne Ogle
> Senior Interaction Designer
> University of California, Berkeley
> Educational Technology Services
> daphne at media.berkeley.edu
> cell (510)847-0308
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fluid-work mailing list
> fluid-work at fluidproject.org
> http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
>
> Allison Bloodworth
> Senior User Interaction Designer
> Educational Technology Services
> University of California, Berkeley
> (415) 377-8243
> abloodworth at berkeley.edu
>
>
>
>
>

Daphne Ogle
Senior Interaction Designer
University of California, Berkeley
Educational Technology Services
daphne at media.berkeley.edu
cell (510)847-0308



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://fluidproject.org/pipermail/fluid-work/attachments/20071218/53f0b7b4/attachment.html>