CLE Content Management BOF
Jim Eng
jimeng at umich.edu
Wed Dec 5 13:14:16 UTC 2007
Since I can't make this meeting today and Clay's message implies that
it is jumping into the agenda I thought was scheduled for Friday, I
want to comment on a couple points.
> - some declaration of intent: essentially that Resources and its
> helpers, along with CHS, are largely on a path of obsolescence over
> the medium to long term, and Fluid and Sakai are jointly working on
> what will arise in its place.
I think I disagree with this statement, but I'd like to hear a little
more of what Clay is thinking. We have outlined some significant
changes in CHS for 2.6, but I don't think we're talking about
retiring CHS any time soon. The plan is that it will be backed by a
JSR-170 repository instead of the existing database implementation.
We are also planning to trim a lot of cruft from the API and begin to
surface some JSR-170 capabilities in the API. There is no plan to
retire CHS.
Also, I don't believe the resources tool or dropbox are being retired
anytime soon. Our focus for the next couple Sakai releases will be
on creating better support for finding, using and organizing
"resources" more directly in the context of user activity. It's
likely that the way in which people use the resources tool will
change. Many instructors might choose not to put the resources tool
in their course sites and instead place links to resources directly
in the context of assignments, modules, the syllabus and other
documents. But it's likely that "resources" will remain an important
tool to many users for organizing collections of resources in user
worksites and project sites.
The UI for the resources tool has gone through a lot of upheaval over
the past three years. That needs to settle down now. Since before
the release of 2.4, we've been trying to shift the focus to the
filepicker. Hopefully we'll see improvement there for 2.6 and beyond.
Dropbox is a specialized resources tool that is important to many
instructors for course sites and is also used in some project sites.
It needs some improvement and may even be replaced by a separate
implementation at some point, but it's unlikely to be retired in the
foreseeable future.
> - An overview of the problem space
> - An overview of the Image Gallery tool as a suggestive case study
> - Fundamental questions we're wrestling with (to stimulate the
> conversation if it's lacking at that point):
> * whether and how to distinguish file management from more abstracted
> content management
> * whether and how to break the model of having each site serve as a
> separate repository
> * whether and how the model of central management of files/content is
> appropriate, and where we need to instead emphasize "helper" modes in
> other contexts.
>
> ~Clay
>
> ----------------------
> This automatic notification message was sent by Sakai Collab
> (https://collab.sakaiproject.org/portal) from the Project:
> Resources site.
> You can modify how you receive notifications at My Workspace >
> Preferences.
>
>
>